Skip to content

Trees delay spring leaf-out to escape insect damage, new study shows

A new study co-authored by Andrew M. Liebhold (FISC) reveals that trees can actively delay budburst in response to past insect damage - reducing future herbivory and reshaping how forests respond to climate change.

Trees are not just passive victims of insect outbreaks. A new study published in Nature Ecology & Evolution shows that they can actively adjust their timing to reduce damage – by delaying the emergence of leaves. The research demonstrates that trees respond to insect herbivory in one year by shifting their phenology in the next.

A trade-off between climate and insects

Spring warming is generally expected to make trees leaf out earlier. However, observations show that this shift has been slower than predicted. The new study helps explain why.

Using five years of satellite data across 60 forest sites in Central Europe, researchers found that trees exposed to higher levels of leaf damage delayed budburst in the following year by around three days. This may seem minor – but it is enough to counteract the effect of a decade of climate warming. The reason lies in timing: many herbivorous insects depend on young leaves emerging at the right moment. By delaying leaf-out, trees effectively “miss” the peak feeding period.

a, Conceptual framework of our study. Low herbivory in year t (tree 1) does not induce a change in budburst timing in year t + 1, resulting in no between-year change in leaf–caterpillar synchrony (living caterpillars) and herbivory. In contrast, high herbivory in year t (tree 2) induces a delay in budburst in year t + 1, which disrupts synchrony between herbivores and leaf emergence and reduces herbivory by premature caterpillar death (indicated by skulls). b, Landscape-scale mosaic of budburst delay in our study area. Each picture shows, for a given year, satellite-detected spatial variability in budburst phenology across pixels (each approximating an individual crown) at one of our 60 sites (site AHC). The extensive interannual variation in budburst timing observed for individual pixels aligns with the variability proposed in the conceptual framework in a. ©Nat Ecol Evol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03071-9

Escaping herbivores in time

This shift has a strong effect. The study shows that delayed budburst reduces subsequent herbivory by about 55%.

Even more strikingly, this strategy remains effective during large-scale insect outbreaks, when trees are under the greatest pressure.

Rather than being overwhelmed, trees that delay leaf emergence can still significantly reduce damage – challenging the assumption that outbreaks always override plant defence mechanisms.

A landscape-scale perspective

One of the key advances of the study is its scale. Instead of focusing on individual trees, researchers used high-resolution satellite data to monitor over 27,000 tree crowns across landscapes.

This revealed a dynamic “phenological mosaic”, where different trees adjust their timing differently depending on past herbivory.

Importantly, the delay was strongest in forests where it provided the greatest benefit – suggesting that this is not just a short-term response, but an adaptive strategy shaped by natural selection.

Implications for forest resilience

These findings highlight a fundamental tension: trees are responding to two opposing pressures of global change.

  • Climate warming pushes them to leaf out earlier
  • Insect herbivory favours later budburst

This creates a potential “evolutionary trap”, where trees must balance growth opportunities against the risk of damage.

At the same time, this dynamic adjustment may help stabilise forest ecosystems. By redistributing herbivore pressure across space and time, trees can reduce extreme damage and maintain resilience.

The relationship illustrates herbivory-driven delays in budburst (top row) and herbivory reductions by delayed budburst (bottom row). Solid lines are GAM predictions of the expected mean response and shaded bands show the 95% confidence intervals around these predictions. a, Across all sites and years, greater leaf herbivory was associated with delayed budburst in the subsequent year. b, At the site level, this association varied substantially in both slope and adjusted R2. c, The association was somewhat stronger at sites experiencing spongy moth outbreaks. d, In turn, across all sites and years, delayed budburst was associated with reduced leaf herbivory. e, Site-level relationships again showed considerable variation in slope and adjusted R2. f, The effect appeared somewhat stronger at outbreak sites. ©Nat Ecol Evol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03071-9

Methods in focus: Satellite-based monitoring of tree phenology and herbivory

  • The study combines ecological data with remote sensing approaches to analyse tree responses at landscape scale.
  • Instead of ground-based observations of individual trees, researchers used radar data from Sentinel-1 satellites.
  • The study area covered approximately 2,400 km² across oak-dominated forests in Bavaria, Germany.
  • Satellite data enable continuous monitoring of canopy dynamics, independent of cloud cover.
  • The dataset includes more than 137,000 observations collected over five years (2017–2021).
  • Data were analysed at a spatial resolution of 10 × 10 m per pixel, corresponding approximately to individual tree crowns.
  • In total, ~27,500 tree-level units were assessed across 60 forest sites.
  • A key natural experiment occurred in 2019, when a large-scale spongy moth (Lymantria dispar) outbreak affected the region.
  • This allowed comparison of tree responses under varying levels of herbivore pressure.

Why it matters

The study shows that predicting forest responses to climate change requires more than temperature data alone.

Biotic interactions, such as plant-insect relationships, play a crucial role and can fundamentally alter expected outcomes.

As global change accelerates, understanding these interactions will be key to managing forests and anticipating the spread and impact of invasive species.

Key takeaways

  • Trees actively respond to insect damage by delaying leaf-out in the following year.
  • Even a small delay (a few days) can significantly reduce leaf damage.
  • This mechanism remains effective even during large-scale insect outbreaks.
  • Trees “escape” herbivores in time by disrupting their synchrony with leaf emergence.
  • The findings help explain why trees are not advancing their phenology as fast as expected under climate warming.
  • Forests are shaped by two opposing pressures: climate warming vs. insect herbivory.

Source: Mallick, S., Lichter, J., Bae, S. et al. Satellite data show trees delay budburst across landscapes to escape herbivores. Nat Ecol Evol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03071-9

Author

Denisa Hrnčířová

Downloads

Satellite data show trees delay budburst across landscapes to escape herbivores
Download
.pdf, 11.2 MB
Press Release_Satellite data show trees delay budburst across landscapes to escape herbivores
Download
.pdf, 0.1 MB

Share

Project HIVE 101187384. Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.